Fix your Crummy AT&T Reception: $150

If you’ve got a speedy, reliable internet connection at work or home, you have a real shot at fixing your lousy AT&T network reception. We’re talking a full five bars and a rock solid connection whenever you’re near your home or office.

But it comes with a price, specifically $150.

For the past week I’ve been using an AT&T “Microcell” (a.k.a. a “femtocell“) hooked to my home network. It’s a small box that looks a bit like a router and acts like as own personal cell tower. Basically, whenever you’re within 40 feet of it, it’ll scoop up all your calls and route them over your internet connection instead of AT&T’s network.

Setup wise, it was pretty straightforward: just bring the box home from the store, hook its internet connection into your router, and turn it on. There’s a web page you go to to register the cell phones that are allowed to use it (up to ten numbers), and then you just wait a bit for it to be activated on AT&T’s network. Once that happens, your iPhone or other AT&T device will show “AT&T M-Cell” for the currently connected network, and you’re good to go.

The experience so far is just as promised, with nary a dropped call or glitchy connection since it was activated. In short, it just works.

The rub comes on the price itself: you’re basically shelling out $150 to fix a network which AT&T really ought to have fixed themselves. Although some rebate schemes are available if you sign up for AT&T DSL, I was happy with my present (cable) internet connection, so I got tagged for the full amount. Plus, you’re really doing AT&T a favor by shipping all your cell traffic off of their network, freeing up bandwidth. It’d be nice if we at least got a rebate or a nice card in the mail to thank us.

Another point of confusion is that AT&T offers the MicroCell both as a standalone, and in conjunction with an “unlimited calling” plan for another $19.99 a month which lets folks burn unlimited minutes while connected to the MicroCell. In theory, this is useful for people on minimal calling plans who nevertheless make a lot of calls from home–but paying a monthly charge to get the unlimited ability to push data over my own network connection would be too much to contemplate. Besides, it’s a moot issue thanks for the mandatory unlimited calling plan that came with my iPhone.

So what’s the bottom line? I bought it, and I’m happy to have had the chance to do so.

If you’re in the same sort of  “1-bar/no-bars” network location I live in, this is an easy, effective way to take a big point of pain out of your personal communications life. I’m obviously not in love with having had to drop the additional cash in order to fix things, but it’s one of those choices which may be a little unpleasant, but is a lot better than the alternatives of either giving up my iPhone or living with a third of my calls dropping mid-conversation.

Amazing, and a Bit Scary: New Photoshop Retouching Feature Preview

[youtube=www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI]

Already, art exhibitions of photography are getting to be more like, “digital paintings inspired by real life” as opposed to actual documentation of a moment in time. With the simplicity of the retouching here, I wonder how it will change our perception of even news photography as a source of proof that a scene actually happened? Changing a tiny detail of a scene can affect its context dramatically–imagine a photo of a person throwing a rock through the air at a policeman with a gun raised in response. Photoshop out the rock and you’re left with a picture of an angry policeman confronting an unarmed man with his arms outstretched.

Already I’ve seen innumerable Photoshops being passed around of famous politicians made to look like they’re wrapping themselves in flags and crosses, prancing around in ridiculous clothes, or giving a Nazi salute…and I’m pretty sure the folks passing the photos around see these not as fakery, but as confirmation of their own notions of what those politicians are really like. Are we sophisticated enough as media consumers to suspect the image was manipulated, and as a result, our emotions are being manipulated as well? I doubt it–and is the alternative to simply disbelieve every image we see unless it’s confirmed by multiple, independent photographers?

It’s going to be an interesting future…

HT: Gizmodo

…And Speaking of Comics on the iPad…

Bill Amend wins the “funniest geek joke I heard today” prize…

http://www.foxtrot.com/2010/03/03212010/

Help: Can You Identify these Comic Folks?

I recently had to switch from Photoshop album to Picasa, and in the process, I lost all of my Picture tags, so I’m desperately trying to remember the names and faces of the folks I took pictures of sometimes almost a decade ago at Comic-Con, Wondercon, and the like.

I’ve gotten most of them, but I’m stumped on about thirty people–Can anyone identify the folks shown in this album?

http://picasaweb.google.com/110747906639244432653/UCFUnidentifiedComicFolks02?feat=directlink

One Worry out of the Way: Kindle app for iPad

This just in: there will (as predicted) be a Kindle app for the iPad. Barnes & Noble is also announcing an iPad app.

Why does this matter? It means that the iPad is effectively the universal e-reader, capable of pulling in purchases from all the major bookstores, as well as Apple’s and public domain party/PDF publications. For myself, I’m planning on grabbing one so I don’t need to haul around hundreds of pages of constantly changing interface specs at meetings.

(That and, err… maybe my comic book listings…)

Found Inside the Old Loveseat, 1995-2010

Tear apart an old couch with a reciprocating saw, and discover a treasure trove…

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/v/9rUyAIz_QGg]

You Gotta Be Kidding Me: Amazon’s “One Click” Patent Stands

The US Patent and Trademark Office just re-affirmed Amazon.com’s patent on 1-click checkout. In other words, the idea of automatically pulling up and simply using a customer’s previously saved customer payment and shipping data is considered so novel that nobody except Amazon (and its licensees) is allowed to use it for the duration of the patent.

As everyone is forced to step through multiple screens when checking out of every gosh darned site on earth for the next decade or so, spare a thought for our friends as the US Patent and Trademark Office.

I don’t blame Amazon.com for attempting to patent this; I blame USPTO for granting (and  affirming) a patent that’s so patently obvious in nature.

Full Story: http://gizmodo.com/5490150/amazon-now-owns-the-concept-of-one+click-online-checkouts

iPad to Launch on April 3rd

A little less than a month from now, we’ll be able to grab one in person; pre-orders through the Apple store start March 12th–although no word as of yet as to whether that applies to both the Wi-fi and 3G models.

For myself, I go back and forth as to whether 3G matters–everywhere I currently would want to use an iPad has a Wifi connection, and I’ve got an iPhone for the odd spot in between). I’ll definitely be grabbing one for myself, however–Ah, but which model?

[polldaddy poll=2799472]

This One’s For Neil…

OK Go: This Too Shall Pass

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/v/qybUFnY7Y8w]

The Million Dollar Club: Action Comics #1 and Detective #27

A few years ago, I had a discussion with then Managing-editor (now Editor in Chief) Brent Frankenhoff of Comics Buyer’s Guide. It went something like this.

Me: [Diamond Comics head] Steve Geppi says he’ll pay $1,000,000 to anyone who sells him a near mint copy of Action #1. I say we get on top of this now and set that as the going price in the guide.

Brent: But what’s Bob [Overstreet] got it at? Like 200,000? Can we really go with that big a jump?

Me: I think the question is this: If I walked into Steve’s office with a near mint Action Comics #1, do I walk out with a deal for a million? I, for one, take Steve at his word*. If so, that’s the market rate. Our job is to match the market, not just make our prices fit into some nice progression from our own last-best-guess. Let’s leave that to the other guides.

* Having once had a meeting with Steve during which he had to casually brush a mint-looking Superman #8 onto a box next to his desk in order to make way for me to put down my laptop, I had little doubt he could make the Action #1 deal happen.


So it was that in the next edition of ComicBase, Action Comics #1 (the first appearance of Superman)  went from $220,000 to a cool million. It was crazy. It was controversial. It…was the only comic in the database that required the use of scientific notation in order to label the y-axis.

And in the past week, it’s proved to be prescient. Indeed, it seems to have understated the value of the book somewhat, as an VF 8.0 copy just sold for a cool million, followed by a similar copy of Detective #27 (The first appearance of Batman) selling for even more: 1.075 million, making it officially the most expensive comic of all time.